Mary Ann Nichols-Smith v. Branch Banking & Trust Company

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2224
MARY ANN NICHOLS-SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY; JENNIFER
ALEXANDER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Lacy H. Thornburg,
District Judge. (CA-03-368-3)
Submitted: December 10, 2004 Decided: January 25, 2005
Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mary Ann Nichols-Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia A. Piekarski,
CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH, L.L.C., Winston-Salem, North Carolina,
Edward Katze, Timothy R. Newton, CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH,
Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Mary Ann Nichols-Smith appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Nichols-Smith v. Branch
Banking & Trust Co., No. CA-03-368-3 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 27, 2004). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --