Puglia Marine, Incorporated v. Trinity Yachts

04-1353Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit19 nov 2004

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1353
PUGLIA MARINE, INCORPORATED,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TRINITY YACHTS,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
HALTER MARINE, INCORPORATED,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (CA-00-3949-4-22)
Argued: October 28, 2004 Decided: November 19, 2004
Before WILKINSON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and Glen E. CONRAD,
United States District Judge for the Western District of Virginia,
sitting by designation.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ARGUED: Keith Moss Babcock, LEWIS, BABCOCK & HAWKINS, Columbia,
South Carolina, for Appellant. Stewart Foster Peck, LUGENBUHL,
WHEATON, PECK, RANKIN & HUBBARD, New Orleans, Louisiana, for
Appellee. ON BRIEF: Robert Monroe Erwin, Jr., Greenwood, South
Carolina; Arthur Camden Lewis, LEWIS, BABCOCK & HAWKINS, Columbia,

-- 1 of 3 --

2
South Carolina, for Appellant. Richard S. Rosen, Alice F. Paylor,
ROSEN, ROSEN & HAGOOD, Charleston, South Carolina; Kristopher M.
Redmann, David B. Sharpe, LUGENBUHL, WHEATON, PECK, RANKIN &
HUBBARD, New Orleans, Louisiana, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
This case arises from a dispute over the insurance proceeds
paid on a yacht that was destroyed by a fire. Puglia Marine
appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Trinity
Yachts on Puglia Marine’s claims for unjust enrichment, promissory
estoppel, and breach of contract.
We review the granting of summary judgment de novo. We have
reviewed the record, briefs, and applicable case law on this
matter, and we have had the benefit of oral argument. Our careful
review persuades us that the rulings of the district court were
correct. Accordingly, we affirm the judgments in favor of Trinity
Yachts on the reasoning of the district court. See Puglia Marine
Dev., Inc. v. Halter Marine, Inc. & Trinity Yachts, C.A. No. 4:00-
3949-22 (D.S.C. March 31, 2003 and Feb. 17, 2004).
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.