Testo completo
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7429
COY R. PHELPS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ART BEELER; JOHN ASHCROFT; CATHY HAWKS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-02-501-5-H)
Submitted: November 21, 2002 Decided: December 4, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Coy R. Phelps, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Coy R. Phelps appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his action brought pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents
of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Phelps v. Beeler, No. CA-02-501-5-H (W.D.N.C. Sept. 5,
2002). We deny Phelps’ motion for hearing en banc and dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
