James Alvin Boulware v. B. Ezell

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7364
JAMES ALVIN BOULWARE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
B. EZELL; CHARLES MCQUEEN; RICHARD TROMBLEY;
SAURE ROBINSON; DANIELL SHAW,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
TOM SMITH; JASON ELLIS; BONNIE HAYS; DAVID
MITCHELL,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CA-99-226-1-MU)
Submitted: January 16, 2003 Decided: January 23, 2003
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
James Alvin Boulware, Appellant Pro Se. Monica Foust Speight,
Jonathan A. Berkelhammer, SMITH MOORE, L.L.P., Greensboro, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
James Alvin Boulware appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his due process claim alleging that he was denied access
to certain legal materials; and granting summary judgment to the
Defendants and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Boulware v. Ezell, No. CA-99-226-1-MU (W.D.N.C. filed
May 30, 2000 & entered May 31, 2000; filed Aug. 30, 2002 & entered
Sept. 3, 2002). We deny Boulware’s motion for appointment of
counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --