Earl Sand v. S. STEELE, Corrections Officer

02-7336Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit8 ago 2003

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7336
EARL SAND,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
S. STEELE, Corrections Officer; L. RICKS,
Corrections Officer, 6-2 Shift; DARLING,
Corrections Officer; B. MOHEAD, Inmate
Hearings Officer A,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-01-11-2)
Submitted: June 19, 2003 Decided: August 8, 2003
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Earl Sand, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant
Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Earl Sand appeals the district court’s order denying relief on
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Sand v. Steele, No. CA-
01-11-2 (E.D. Va. Aug. 15, 2002). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.