Testo completo
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7037
BERNARD M. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
EDDIE LEE PEARSON, Chief Warden,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, District
Judge. (CA-01-288)
Submitted: August 29, 2002 Decided: September 9, 2002
Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bernard M. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Bernard M. Williams appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2002) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting
the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Williams v. Pearson, No. CA-01-288 (E.D. Va. July 1, 2002).
Williams’ motions for appointment of counsel and for oral argument
are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
