Testo completo
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6534
HUGO TENAUD,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
D. SCOTT DODRILL, Warden, LSCI Butner,
Butner, NC,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CA-02-49-BO)
Submitted: October 18, 2002 Decided: October 31, 2002
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hugo Tenaud, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Hugo Tenaud appeals the district court’s order denying relief
on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition, construing the petition as
a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, and dismissing it as successive.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See Tenaud v. Dodrill, No. CA-02-49-BO
(E.D.N.C. Jan. 29, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
