Perry L. Colter v. Office of the State’s Attorney for Baltimore City

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6124
PERRY L. COLTER,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
OFFICE OF THE STATE’S ATTORNEY FOR BALTIMORE
CITY; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF
MARYLAND,
Respondents - Appellees.
No. 02-6125
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
PERRY L. COLTER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.
(CA-01-1327-CCB, CR-95-405-CCB, CA-99-3752)

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Submitted: March 11, 2002 Decided: March 21, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Perry L. Colter, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attor-
ney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Thomas Michael DiBiagio, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Perry L. Colter appeals the
district court’s order (1) denying relief on his petition filed
under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001) (No. 02-6124);
and (2) denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West
Supp. 2001) (No. 02-6125). We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. According-
ly, we deny certificates of appealability and dismiss the appeals
in both Nos. 02-6124 and 02-6125 on the reasoning of the district
court. See Colter v. United States, Nos. CA-01-1327-CCB; CR-95-
405-CCB; CA-99-3752 (D. Md. filed Dec. 28, 2001; entered Dec. 31,
2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 3 of 3 --