Terrence McCrady v. the Town of Wardensville

02-2421Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit12 feb 2003

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-2421
TERRENCE MCCRADY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THE TOWN OF WARDENSVILLE; HARDY COUNTY;
WILLIAM D. MOOMAU; DONALD ROTRUCK; DAVID
WARREN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater,
District Judge. (CA-02-23-3)
Submitted: February 6, 2003 Decided: February 12, 2003
Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terrence McCrady, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Douglas Lorensen,
BOWLES, RICE, MCDAVID, GRAFF & LOVE, Martinsburg, West Virginia,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Terrence McCrady appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See McCrady
v. Town of Wardensville, No. CA-02-23-3 (N.D.W. Va. Nov. 7, 2002).
We deny McCrady’s motion for oral argument and his motion to strike
Appellees’ informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.