Rosemary Trinh Huynh v. PAUL H. O’NEILL, Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1618
ROSEMARY TRINH HUYNH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PAUL H. O’NEILL, Secretary of the United
States Department of the Treasury,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
JOSIE WOOD, I.S.D. Manager; SUSAN THOMPSON,
Chief Manager,
Defendants.
No. 02-1832
ROSEMARY TRINH HUYNH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PAUL H. O’NEILL, Secretary of the United
States Department of the Treasury,
Defendant - Appellee,

-- 1 of 3 --

2
and
JOSIE WOOD, I.S.D. Manager; SUSAN THOMPSON,
Chief Manager,
Defendants.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-01-445-3)
Submitted: October 21, 2002 Decided: November 7, 2002
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rosemary Trinh Huynh, Appellant Pro Se. Debra Jean Prillaman,
Assistant United States Attorney, Joan Elizabeth Evans, Assistant
United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Rosemary Trinh Huynh appeals the district court’s order
adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and
granting the Appellee’s motion for summary judgment in her Title
VII action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. Huynh v. O’Neil, No. CA-01-
445-3 (E.D. Va. May 29, 2002). We deny the Appellee’s motion to
dismiss or strike the appeal. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --