In re: STUART HILL; In Re: VICKI HILL

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1370
In Re: STUART HILL; In Re: VICKI HILL,
Debtors.
STUART HILL; VICKI HILL,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
STATE OF MARYLAND, (O.A.G.) Consumer
Protection Division,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA-
01-692-CCB, AP-99-5579-JS)
Submitted: August 29, 2002 Decided: September 4, 2002
Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Stuart Hill, Vicki Hill, Appellants Pro Se. Philip David Ziperman,
Assistant Attorney General, Steven M. Sakamoto-Wengel, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Stuart Hill and Vicki Hill appeal from the district court’s
order affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders finding that the
claim of the Maryland Consumer Protection Division is
nondischargeable and dismissing the Hills’ counterclaims. Our
review of the record and the opinions below discloses no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. In re: Hill, No. CA-01-692-CCB (D. Md. Feb. 12, 2002). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --