Karim Abdul Akbar v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517 1984 . 2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this…

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7364
KARIM ABDUL AKBAR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LIEUTENANT MCKINNEY; SERGEANT RASCOE; G. L.
HENRY, Sergeant; J. HAYNES, Warden,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
OFFICER BOWMAN,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-99-496)
Submitted: December 20, 2001 Decided: January 14, 2002
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Karim Abdul Akbar, Appellant Pro Se. John Payne Scherer, II,
Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

-- 1 of 2 --

* To the extent Akbar alleges a due process violation, we note
Akbar had an adequate post-deprivation remedy. See Hudson v.
Palmer, 468 U.S. 517 (1984).
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Karim Abdul Akbar appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny Akbar’s motion for appointment of
counsel and affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district
court.* Akbar v. McKinney, No. CA-99-496 (M.D.N.C. July 20, 2001).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --