United States of America v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 1949 . The

01-2269Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit21 mar 2002

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2269
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JOSE ANTONIO LOZANO,
Claimant - Appellant,
and
PROPERTY, 3714 CANCUN LOOP, WEBB COUNTY,
LAREDO, TEXAS, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND
IMPROVEMENTS THEREON,
Defendant,
versus
HILL TOP FARM, LIMITED, a Texas limited
partnership,
Claimant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (CA-98-11-1)
Submitted: March 14, 2002 Decided: March 21, 2002

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jose Antonio Lozano, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne P. Klauer, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Jose Antonio Lozano appeals the district court’s order denying
his motions for a transcript and for application of a specific
statute. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, because
the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction
only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain
interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed.
R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S.
541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor
an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.