Van Keith Herridge v. Traverse Computer Brokers, 973 F.2d 345, 347 4th Cir. 1992 . 2 PER CURIAM: Ingeborg…

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2159
VAN KEITH HERRIDGE,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
INGEBORG GINSBERG, a/k/a Ingeborg Neufeld,
a/k/a Ingeborg Kollman, a/k/a Ingeborg Kruger,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District
Judge. (CA-99-1784-2-23)
Submitted: March 21, 2002 Decided: March 27, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ingeborg Ginsberg, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Neil Rosen, ROSEN,
GOODSTEIN, & HAGOOD, L.L.C., Charleston, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

* While the appeal from this order was originally
interlocutory, the district court’s intervening final order renders
review permissible under the doctrine of cumulative finality.
Equip. Fin. Group, Inc. v. Traverse Computer Brokers, 973 F.2d 345,
347 (4th Cir. 1992).
2
PER CURIAM:
Ingeborg Ginsberg appeals the district court’s order denying
her “request to quash civil action.” * Our review of the record
discloses no reversible error and no abuse of discretion.
Ginsberg’s motion was filed after the district court had properly
entered a partial default judgment against her. Accordingly, we
affirm. We deny Ginsberg’s motions to disqualify attorney Rosen,
and her motions to place the appeal in abeyance and dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --