Arthur O. Armstrong v. Watson

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1226
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WATSON, et al,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 01-1227
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WATSON, et al,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 01-1233
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,

-- 1 of 3 --

2
versus
OFFICER WATSON; OFFICER COOK; CHRISTINE
DUFFANY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., and
William L. Osteen, District Judges. (MISC-01-20-1, MISC-01-21-1,
CA-97-1335-1)
Submitted: May 3, 2001 Decided: May 17, 2001
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arthur O. Armstrong, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Thompson Wright,
Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Arthur O. Armstrong appeals
district court orders dismissing his motions for leave to reopen an
action. We have reviewed the record and the district court orders
and find no error. Accordingly, we deny Armstrong’s motions for
leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals as friv-
olous. We further deny Armstrong’s motions for summary judgment.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 3 of 3 --