United States of America v. Thomas A. Wilkinson, Iii

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7779
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
THOMAS A. WILKINSON, III,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 01-6175
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
EDWARD M. CONK,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CR-95-68, CA-99-688-R)
Submitted: May 24, 2001 Decided: July 3, 2001

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeffrey Daniel Zimmerman, Alexandria, Virginia; Marcia Gail Shein,
LAW OFFICE OF MARCIA G. SHEIN, P.C., Decatur, Georgia, for Appel-
lants. David T. Maguire, Assistant United States Attorney, Rich-
mond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Thomas A. Wilkinson, III, and
Edward M. Conk seek to appeal the district court’s order denying
their motions filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny certificates of appeal-
ability and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Wilkinson, Nos. CR-95-68; CA-99-688-R;
United States v. Conk, Nos. CR-95-68; CA-99-688-R (E.D. Va. Nov.
22, 2000). We deny Conk’s motions to supplement the appeal. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 3 of 3 --