Charles Bennie Hunt v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 4th Cir. 1986 . 3 PER CURIAM: In these consolidated…

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6033
CHARLES BENNIE HUNT,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
D. SCOTT DODRILL,
Respondent - Appellee.
No. 00-6036
CHARLES BENNIE HUNT,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
D. SCOTT DODRILL,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior
District Judge. (CA-99-414-3-P, CR-88-177-C-P)
Submitted: August 24, 2000 Decided: August 29, 2000

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Bennie Hunt, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on
December 6, 2000, the district court’s records show that it was
entered on the docket sheet on December 8, 2000. Pursuant to Rules
58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the
date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as
the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v.
Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).
3
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Charles Bennie Hunt appeals
from the district court’s orders: (1) denying relief on his 28
U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West Supp. 2000) motion and (2) denying his Fed.
R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration. Our review of the
record and the district court’s opinions discloses no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Hunt v. Dodrill, Nos. CA-99-414-3-P; CR-88-177-C-P
(W.D.N.C. Oct. 20, 1999 & Dec. 8, 1999). * We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --