Joseph Johnson, Jr v. King, No. CA-98-1368-A E.D. Va. Dec. 9, 1999 . We deny Johnson’s motion to…

00-6026Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit5 giu 2000

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6026
JOSEPH JOHNSON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CHARLES LEWIS KING,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District
Judge. (CA-98-1368-A)
Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 5, 2000
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Johnson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Charles Lewis King,
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Johnson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dis-
missing his civil action as frivolous. We have reviewed the record
and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Johnson v. King, No. CA-98-1368-A (E.D. Va. Dec. 9, 1999). We deny
Johnson’s motion to supplement the record on appeal and dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.