Charles W. Kendle v. Officemax, Incorporated

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2494
CHARLES W. KENDLE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
OFFICEMAX, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge.
(CA-00-133-2)
Submitted: February 8, 2001 Decided: February 13, 2001
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles W. Kendle, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael Lucas, Kristina
Helen Vaquera, Ruth Goodboe, MCGUIREWOODS, L.L.P., Norfolk, Vir-
ginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Charles W. Kendle appeals the district court’s order dismiss-
ing his civil action alleging employment discrimination. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Kendle v. OfficeMax, Inc., No. CA-00-133-2
(E.D. Va. Oct. 24, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --