Michael B. Williams v. Roy E. Hancock

00-2485Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27 lug 2001

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2485
MICHAEL B. WILLIAMS; LISA WILLIAMS; BELTWAY
PAVING COMPANY, INCORPORATED; BELTWAY TRUCK &
TIRE, INCORPORATED,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
ROY E. HANCOCK; MELVIN C. BEALL, JR.; MARLAND
DEEN; COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF CHARLES COUNTY,
MARYLAND,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-
00-2221-PJM)
Submitted: June 29, 2001 Decided: July 27, 2001
Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shawn C. Whittaker, SILVERMAN & ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED, N. Bethesda,
Maryland, for Appellant. John F. Breads, Columbia, Maryland; John
A. Buchanan, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY FOR CHARLES COUNTY, La
Plata, Maryland, for Appellees.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Michael B. Williams and related Appellants appeal the district
court’s order dismissing their civil action alleging claims under
42 U.S.C. § 1983. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Williams v.
Hancock, No. CA-00-2221-PJM (D. Md. filed Oct 24, 2000; entered
Oct. 25, 2000) (dismissing for reasons as stated in open court).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.