Eddie Currence v. Bruce Hardwood Flooring Limited Partnership, d/b/a Bruce Hardwood Flooring

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2393
EDDIE CURRENCE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BRUCE HARDWOOD FLOORING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
d/b/a Bruce Hardwood Flooring; TRIANGLE
PACIFIC CORPORATION, d/b/a Bruce Hardwood
Flooring, a Division of Triangle Pacific
Corporation,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior
District Judge. (CA-99-101-2)
Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: September 10, 2001
Before WILKINS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eddie Currence, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Bograd, Frederick Martin
Thurman, Jr., SHUMAKER, LOOP & KENDRICK, Charlotte, North Carolina;
Frank P. Bush, Jr., BUSH & BUSH, Elkins, West Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Eddie Currence appeals the district court’s order granting
relief for Defendants in Currence’s action claiming age discrim-
ination in employment. We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Currence v.
Bruce Hardwood Flooring Ltd. P’ship, No. CA-99-101-2 (N.D.W. Va.
Sept. 27, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --