National Grange Mutual Insurance Company v. Richard Lynwood Chisman, a/k/a Bay

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1334
NATIONAL GRANGE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
and
WOW, INCORPORATED, t/a Insurance Center of
Williamsburg; DEBORAH BRESNAHAM,
Third Party Defendants - Appellees,
versus
RICHARD LYNWOOD CHISMAN, a/k/a Bay; JOYCE ANN
CHISMAN,
Defendants - Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
(CA-99-362-3)
Submitted: December 20, 2000 Decided: January 8, 2001
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Kenneth L. Roberts, ROBERTS & ROBERTS, P.C., Newport News, Virgin-
ia, for Appellants. Robert Tayloe Ross, Michael L. Rigsby, MIDKIFF
MUNCIE & ROSS, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; Douglas M. Palais,
MCCANDLISH, KANE & GRANT, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Richard Lynwood Chisman and Joyce Ann Chisman appeal from the
district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the
Appellees in this action in which National Grange Mutual Insurance
Company sought a declaration that the insurance policy it issued to
the Chismans was void. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs, the
joint appendix, the supplemental joint appendix, and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. National Grange
Mut. Ins. Co. v. Chisman, No. CA-99-362-3 (E.D. Va. Feb. 14, 2000).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --