Jerry Beaty v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 4th Cir. 1986 . 2 Unpublished opinions are not…

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1176
JERRY BEATY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BARDON, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Merit Concrete,
Incorporated,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
TEDD SCHOCH; RICHARD CODRINGTON; ANTHONY
FABIAN; DANIEL AHLBORN,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-99-1494-AW)
Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 2, 2000
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerry Beaty, Appellant Pro Se. Norman Robert Buchsbaum, Balti-
more, Maryland, for Appellee.

-- 1 of 2 --

* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on
January 4, 2000, the district court’s records show that it was
entered on the docket sheet on January 6, 2000. Pursuant to Rules
58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the
date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as
the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v.
Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Jerry Beaty appeals the district court’s order dismissing his
civil action alleging employment discrimination. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Beaty v. Bardon, Inc., No. CA-99-1494-AW (D. Md. Jan.
6, 2000). * We deny Beaty’s motion for appointment of counsel and
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --