US v. Martin Santillan

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 26-6245

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MARTIN VIDAL SANTILLAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 26-6363

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MARTIN VIDAL SANTILLAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
at Statesville. Kenneth D. Bell, District Judge. (5:18-cr-00048-KDB-SCR-13)

Submitted: July 16, 2026 Decided: July 21, 2026

2

Before WILKINSON, RICHARDSON, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Martin Vidal Santillan, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

3

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Martin Vidal Santillan appeals the district court’s
orders denying his pro se motions for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391,
§ 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. Having carefully reviewed the record, we discern no
reversible error in the district court’s orders. See United States v. Moody, 115 F.4th 304,
310 (4th Cir. 2024) (explaining standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s orders. United States v. Santillan, No. 5:18-cr-00048-KDB-SCR-13 (W.D.N.C.
Feb. 5, 2026; Mar. 9, 2026). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED