In re: Magus Ahnend

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 26-1726

In re: MAGUS JAMYE REFICUL AHNEND,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Beckley. (5:26-cv-00199)

Submitted: July 16, 2026 Decided: July 21, 2026

Before WILKINSON, RICHARDSON, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Magus Jamye Reficul Ahnend, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM:
Magus Jamye Reficul Ahnend petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging that the
district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his objections to the magistrate judge’s report
and recommendation in Ahnend’s civil case. He seeks an order from this court directing
the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district
court adopted the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissed Ahnend’s case on
June 25, 2026. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Ahnend’s case,
we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED