In re: Jimmy Allred

26-1720United States Court Of Appeals For The 4th Circuit28 lug 2026

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 26-1720

In re: JIMMY LEE ALLRED,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. (1:24-cr-00351-WO-1)

Submitted: July 23, 2026 Decided: July 28, 2026

Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmy Lee Allred, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Lee Allred petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court
has unduly delayed in ruling on several motions filed after his criminal judgment was
entered, including motions for discovery, for disclosure of grand jury minutes, and to
supplement the record. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act.
Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the court denied Allred’s motions for
discovery and for disclosure of grand jury materials on July 1, 2026. Accordingly, Allred’s
request for mandamus relief as to these motions is moot. Furthermore, the present record
does not reveal undue delay in the district court as to Allred’s remaining motion.
*

Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

*
In his mandamus petition, Allred also claims the district court has not ruled on
other motions, including a bond motion and a motion to proceed pro se. Those motions,
however, do not appear on the district court’s docket.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.