Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 v. Chief Judge Derrick Watson

26-1267United States Court Of Appeals For The 4th Circuit28 lug 2026

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 26-1267

PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE NUMBER P60005535, a/k/a Ronald Satish Emrit,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

and

PRESIDENTIAL COMMITTEE/POLITICAL ACTION
COMMITTEE/SEPARATE SEGREGATED FUND (SSF) NUMBER C00569897,
d/b/a United Emrits of America,

Plaintiff,

v.

CHIEF JUDGE DERRICK WATSON, of Honolulu, Hawaii, United States District
Court of Hawaii; JUDGE MICHAEL SEABRIGHT; JUDGE LESLIE
KOBAYASHIA; JUDGE JILL OTAKE; JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR;
MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Harrisonburg. Elizabeth K. Dillon, Chief District Judge. (5:25-cv-00139-EKD-JCH)

Submitted: July 23, 2026 Decided: July 28, 2026

Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Presidential Candidate Number P60005535, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Satish Emrit (who also identifies himself as Presidential Candidate Number
P60005535) filed a notice of appeal in his civil case almost three months after filing his
complaint and before the district court had entered any orders. This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan
Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). Emrit does not seek to appeal either a final order or
an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack
of jurisdiction.
*
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED

*
Because Emrit’s notice of appeal cannot supply jurisdiction to review the district
court’s dismissal order entered after he filed his notice of appeal, Emrit must file another
notice of appeal if he wishes to appeal that order.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.