United States of America v. Charles Bornman

PRECEDENTIAL
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
NO. 07-3447
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
CHARLES BORNMAN
Appellant
On Appeal From the United States District Court
For the District of the Virgin Islands
(D.C. Crim. Action No. 03-cr-00127-1)
District Judge: Hon. Raymond L. Finch
Argued December 10, 2008
BEFORE: FISHER, JORDAN and
STAPLETON, Circuit Judges
(Opinion Filed March 6, 2009)
ORDER AMENDING OPINION
STAPLETON, Circuit Judge:
The Court having concluded that the phrase, “quid pro quo” is utilized in
appellants’ briefing solely in the context of the argument addressed and resolved in the
paragraph of its opinion bridging pages 11 and 12,

-- 1 of 2 --

2
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the opinion in this matter filed on
March 6, 2009, is hereby amended as follows:
On page 12, the first paragraph of V. Additional Count Two Arguments is
deleted in its entirety.
The next paragraph of that section, which now becomes the first paragraph, is
amended by adding the following new first sentence:
Bornman makes several additional arguments relating to Count Two
which we find without merit.
The second sentence of that paragraph is amended by striking the word “also”.
By the Court
/s/ Walter K. Stapleton
Circuit Judge
DATED: May 5, 2009

-- 2 of 2 --