United States of America v. Marcos Santiago

064728np-pdfCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit30 apr 2007

Testo completo

DLD-203 NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 06-4728
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
MARCOS SANTIAGO,
Appellant
On Appeal From the United States District Court
For the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
(D.C. Crim. No. 03-cr-00157)
District Judge: Honorable Timothy J. Savage
Submitted For Possible Summary Action Under Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6
April 19, 2007
Before: BARRY, AMBRO and FISHER, Circuit Judges
(Filed: April 30, 2007)
OPINION
PER CURIAM
Marcos Santiago appeals the District Court’s order denying his “Motion to order
government to disclose to defendant all Jencks material within their possession.” In April
2004, Santiago was convicted of robbery and firearm charges and sentenced to 402

-- 1 of 2 --

2
months in prison. His conviction and sentence were affirmed on appeal. Santiago filed a
“Motion to order government to disclose to defendant all Jencks material within their
possession.” The District Court denied both the motion and Santiago’s motion for
reconsideration. Santiago filed a timely notice of appeal, and we have jurisdiction
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Santiago argues that he needs copies of all statements made by a witness against
him at his criminal trial in order to bring a § 2255 motion. According to the electronic
docket for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Santiago filed a § 2255 motion on
January 19, 2007. A discovery motion filed in those proceedings is the appropriate
vehicle for obtaining such documents if they exist.
Summary action is appropriate if there is no substantial question presented in the
appeal. See Third Circuit LAR 27.4. For the above reasons, we will summarily affirm
the District Court’s order. See Third Circuit I.O.P. 10.6.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.