Renee Annette Chrustowski v. LOUIS DEJOY, Postmaster General and Chief Exec- utive Officer

N OTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
RENEE ANNETTE CHRUSTOWSKI,
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
LOUIS DEJOY, Postmaster General and Chief Exec-
utive Officer,
Defendant-Appellee
USPS HEADQUARTERS, GIANT FOODS,
Defendants
______________________
2024-2075
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of Delaware in No. 1:24-cv-00037-CFC, Chief
Judge Colm F. Connolly.
______________________
Before BRYSON, P ROST , and HUGHES , Circuit Judges.
P ER CURIAM .
O R D E R
In response to this court’s August 16, 2024 show cause
order, Louis DeJoy urges dismissal. Renee Annette
Chrustowski requests transfer “to a court or agency who is
Case: 24-2075 Document: 12 Page: 1 Filed: 11/12/2024

-- 1 of 3 --

CHRUSTOWSKI v. DEJOY 2
willing to compensate [her] with the monetary compensa-
tion that [she is] entitled to.” ECF No. 7 at 1.
Ms. Chrustowski filed her complaint at the United
States District Court for the District of Delaware on Janu-
ary 11, 2024, claiming $100 million of damages for alleged
labor violations. She moved to proceed in forma pauperis,
which the district court granted on February 13, 2024. Ms.
Chrustowski filed a notice of appeal to this court on July 8,
2024, indicating she was seeking review of “pending court
of appeals 3 rd Circuit P.A.” ECF No. 1-2 at 1. The district
court has not issued any further orders or decisions.
We dismiss. This court’s jurisdiction to review deci-
sions of federal district courts is limited to cases arising
under the patent laws, see 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(1); civil ac-
tions on review to the district court from the United States
Patent and Trademark Office, see § 1295(a)(4)(C); or cer-
tain damages claims against the United States “not exceed-
ing $10,000 in amount,” 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(2), see 28
U.S.C. § 1295(a)(2); 28 U.S.C. § 1292(c)(1). Ms.
Chrustowski’s complaint raises no such claim.
Transfer to the United States Court of Appeals for the
Third Circuit or any other circuit is not appropriate here
under 28 U.S.C. § 1631, because Ms. Chrustowski is not
appealing from a decision that could give rise to a proper
appeal in any court of appeals. Nor has Ms. Chrustowski
shown any basis to transmit this matter to the Supreme
Court of the United States to the extent the notice was in-
tended to seek review of unspecified Third Circuit deci-
sions.
Accordingly,
I T I S O RDERED T HAT :
(1) The case is dismissed.
Case: 24-2075 Document: 12 Page: 2 Filed: 11/12/2024

-- 2 of 3 --

CHRUSTOWSKI v. DEJOY 3
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
November 12, 2024
Date
F OR THE COURT
Case: 24-2075 Document: 12 Page: 3 Filed: 11/12/2024

-- 3 of 3 --