Centripetal Networks, LLC v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
CENTRIPETAL NETWORKS, LLC,
Appellant
v.
PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC.,
Appellee
______________________
2023-1731
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021-
01158.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
JAMES R. HANNAH, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel
LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, argued for appellant. Also
represented by PAUL J. ANDRE; JEFFREY PRICE, New York,
NY; JOHN R. HUTCHINS, SCOTT M. KELLY, BRADLEY CHARLES
WRIGHT, Banner & Witcoff, Ltd., Washington, DC.
DOUGLAS HALLWARD-DRIEMEIER, Ropes & Gray LLP,
Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by
JAMES RICHARD BATCHELDER, ANDREW T. RADSCH, East
Palo Alto, CA.
Case: 23-1731 Document: 37 Page: 1 Filed: 11/06/2024

-- 1 of 2 --

______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (HUGHES, MAYER, and STARK, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
November 6, 2024
Date
Case: 23-1731 Document: 37 Page: 2 Filed: 11/06/2024

-- 2 of 2 --