Polycom, Inc. v. Directpacket Research, Inc.

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
POLYCOM, INC.,
Appellant
v.
DIRECTPACKET RESEARCH, INC.,
Appellee
______________________
2021-1744
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2019-
01234.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
G EOFFREY P. EATON, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washing-
ton, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by D AVID
D ALKE, Los Angeles, CA; N OOROSSADAT T ORABI, San Fran-
cisco, CA; K ATHERINE VIDAL , Redwood City, CA.
T ERENCE P. ROSS , Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP,
Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by
CHRISTOPHER F ERENC , ERIC T HOMAS WERLINGER .
______________________
Case: 21-1744 Document: 35 Page: 1 Filed: 12/13/2021

-- 1 of 2 --

T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and ADJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, D YK and REYNA,
Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
December 13, 2021
Date
/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
Case: 21-1744 Document: 35 Page: 2 Filed: 12/13/2021

-- 2 of 2 --