Michael Royster v. Marirosa Lamas

2013-1065Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit7 gen 2013

Testo completo

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
mtntteb ~tates qrourt of §ppeaIs
for tbe jfeberaI qrtrcutt
MICHAEL ROYSTER,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
MARIROSA LAMAS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY
OF THE COUNTY OF S. WILLIAMS, AND THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF,
Respondents-Appellees.
2013-1065
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania in case no. 11-CV-0477,
Chief Judge J. Curtis Joyner.
ON MOTION
ORDER
Having received no objection to this court's order
dated December 3, 2012,
IT Is ORDERED THAT:
Case: 13-1065 Document: 7 Page: 1 Filed: 01/07/2013

-- 1 of 2 --

MICHAEL ROYSTER V. MARIROSA LAMAS 2
(1) This appeal and any pending motions are trans-
ferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third
Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631.
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
FOR THE COURT
lsI Jan Horbaly
Jan Horbaly
Clerk
s21
Issued As A Mandate: _......:J_A_N_O_1_2_01_3 __
Case: 13-1065 Document: 7 Page: 2 Filed: 01/07/2013

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.