Rebecca Gallogly v. United States

20-150Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit19 ott 2020

Testo completo

N
OTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
REBECCA GALLOGLY,
Petitioner

v.

UNITED STATES,
Respondent
______________________

2020-150
______________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States
Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:20-cv-00261-MCW, Senior
Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams.
______________________

ON PETITION AND MOTION
______________________

Before
DYK, WALLACH, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges.
P
ER CURIAM.
O R D E R
Rebecca Gallogly petitions for a writ of mandamus di-
recting the United States Court of Federal Claims to docket
submissions entitled “Plaintiff’s Amended Objections to
Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief from
Judgment,” ECF No. 2-1 at 10–28, and “Motion for Leave
Case: 20-150 Document: 5 Page: 1 Filed: 10/19/2020

GALLOGLY v. US
2
to File Amended Objections,” ECF No. 2-1 at 29–45. She
also moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
Review of the docket before the Court of Federal
Claims shows that these documents were entered on the
docket on September 14, 2020. See Gallogly v. United
States, No. 1:20-cv-00261-MCW (Fed. Cl. Aug. 28, 2020),
ECF No. 33. Additionally, on September 21, 2020, that
court granted Dr. Gallogly’s motion for leave to file
amended objections. See Gallogly v. United States, No.
1:20-cv-00261-MCW (Fed. Cl. Sept. 21, 2020), ECF No. 35.
Because Dr. Gallogly has received the requested relief,
we deny her petition as moot.
Accordingly,
I
T IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The petition for writ of mandamus is denied as
moot.
(2) The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis
is granted.

October 19, 2020
Date
FOR THE COURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court

s25
Case: 20-150 Document: 5 Page: 2 Filed: 10/19/2020

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.