Invista North America S.a.r.l. v. M&gpolymers USA LLC and M&gusa Corporation

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
INVISTA NORTH AMERICA S.A.R.L.,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
AND
AURIGA POLYMERS INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
M&G POLYMERS USA LLC AND
M&G USA CORPORATION,
Defendants-Appellants.
______________________
2014-1432
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of Delaware in No. 1:11-cv-01007-SLR-CJB,
Judge Sue L. Robinson.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
MEGAN D. D ORTENZO, Thompson Hine LLP, of Cleve-
land, Ohio, argued for defendants-appellants. With her
on the brief was ARTHUR P. LICYGIEWICZ. Of counsel on
the brief were WILLIAM P. ATKINS and C HRISTOPHER K.

-- 1 of 2 --

D ORSEY , Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, of
McLean, Virginia.
WILLIAM J. MARSDEN, J R., Fish & Richardson P.C., of
Wilmington, Delaware, argued for plaintiffs-appellees.
With him on the brief for INVISTA North America S.a.r.l.
were D OUGLAS E. MCCANN, MARTINA T YREUS HUFNAL ,
ROBERT M. O AKES , and MICHELLE N EROZZI-ANKENBRAND.
On the brief for Auriga Polymers Inc. were J OHN W. SHAW
and J EFFREY T. CASTELLANO, Shaw Keller LLP, of Wil-
mington, Delaware.
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (P ROST , Chief Judge, N EWMAN and
HUGHES , Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
August 13, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court

-- 2 of 2 --