Ninestar Technology Co., Ltd., Ninestar Technology Company, Ltd., Town Sky, Inc. v. International Trade Commission

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2008-1201
NINESTAR TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., NINESTAR TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, LTD.,
TOWN SKY, INC.,
Appellants,
and
DATAPRODUCTS USA, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,
Appellee,
and
EPSON PORTLAND INC., EPSON AMERICA, INC., AND SEIKO EPSON
CORPORATION,
Intervenors.
Edward F. O’Connor, The Eclipse Group LLP, of Irvine, California, argued for all
appellants.
Wayne W. Herrington, Assistant General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, United
States International Trade Commission, of Washington, DC, argued for appellee. With him on
the brief were James M. Lyons, General Counsel, and Michael K. Haldenstein, Attorney.
Harold A. Barza, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP, of Los Angeles,
California, argued for intervenors. With him on the brief were Tigran Guledjian and Aaron B.
Craig; and Sanford I. Weisburst, of New York, New York. Of counsel on the brief were Louis S.
Mastriani and Michael L. Doane, Adduci, Mastriani, & Schaumberg L.L.P., of Washington, DC.
Appealed from: United States International Trade Commission

-- 1 of 2 --

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2008-1201
NINESTAR TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., NINESTAR TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, LTD.,
TOWN SKY, INC.,
Appellants,
and
DATAPRODUCTS USA, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,
Appellee,
and
EPSON PORTLAND INC., EPSON AMERICA, INC., AND SEIKO EPSON
CORPORATION,
Intervenors.
Judgment
ON APPEAL from the United States International Trade Commission
in CASE NO(S). 337-TA-565
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge, SCHALL and PROST, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED January 13, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Jan Horbaly, Clerk

-- 2 of 2 --