USA v. Lenard Roy Gibbs

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 19-13510
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LENARD ROY GIBBS,
a.k.a. Danger,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
D.C. Docket No. 1:17-cr-00207-CAP-CMS-1
____________________
USCA11 Case: 19-13510 Date Filed: 08/11/2022 Page: 1 of 3

-- 1 of 3 --

2 Opinion of the Court 19-13510
Before WILSON, B RANCH, and LAGOA , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This court has considered all of Defendant-Appellant Lenard
Roy Gibbs’s specifications of error, including:
1. Whether district court abused its discretion by admitting
testimony that a witness who identified Gibbs as the rob-
ber was a probation officer.
2. Whether the district court abused its discretion by admit-
ting expert testimony under Federal Rule of Evidence
702 and
Daubert.
3. Whether the district court abused its discretion by failing
to declare a mistrial after the foreperson brought a text-
book to jury deliberations.
4. Whether the district court abused its discretion by admit-
ting the out-of-court identifications of Gibbs as the rob-
ber.
5. Whether the district court erred by finding that “more
than sufficient” probable cause supported Gibbs’s arrest.
6. Whether the district court erred when it gave jury in-
structions.
7. Whether there was cumulative error.
After review and consideration of the briefs and the record,
and with the benefit of oral argument, we find no reversible error
USCA11 Case: 19-13510 Date Filed: 08/11/2022 Page: 2 of 3

-- 2 of 3 --

19-13510 Opinion of the Court 3
in the district court’s proceedings. Therefore, the district court’s
decisions are affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 19-13510 Date Filed: 08/11/2022 Page: 3 of 3

-- 3 of 3 --