USA v. Gaspar Bishop

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-12462
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 4:10-cr-00096-RH-WCS-3
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GASPAR BISHOP,
a.k.a. Nigel Humphrey,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
_________________________
(September 10, 2012)
Before HULL, MARTIN and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Randolph P. Murrell, appointed counsel for Gaspar Bishop, in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
Case: 11-12462 Date Filed: 09/10/2012 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We have reviewed both counsel’s brief and
Bishop’s response. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bishops’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2
Case: 11-12462 Date Filed: 09/10/2012 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --