USA v. Herdis Neal Brown

10-14393Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit20 mag 2011

Testo completo

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
MAY 20, 2011
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 10-14393
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 5:10-cr-00033-RS-LB-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
HERDIS NEAL BROWN,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Florida
_________________________
(May 20, 2011)
Before HULL, PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
Jonathan Dingus, appointed counsel for Herdis Neal Brown in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.

-- 1 of 2 --

1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Brown’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.