Regents of the University of California Professional Patient Care (PERB 0248H)

STATE 	OF 	CALIFORNIA
PUBLIC 	EMPLOYMENT 	RELATIONS 	BOARD
In 	the Matter 	of:
UNIT 	DETERMINATION 	FOR 	PROFESSIONAL
PATIENT 	CARE EMPLOYEES 	OF 	THE
UNIVERSITY 	OF 	CALIFORNIA 	PURSUANT 	TO
CHAPTER 744 	OF 	STATUTES 	OF 	1978
(HIGHER 	EDUCATION 	EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE
RELATIONS 	ACT)
Case Nos. 	SF-PC-1001
et al.
PERB Decision No. 	248-H
September 	30, 	1982
Appearances; 	(Petitioners, 	Requestors, 	and 	Interested Parties)
Van Bourg, 	Allen, Weinberg 	and Roger, 	Attorneys 	for 	United
Health Care Employees, 	SEIU, 	Locals 535 and 660; 	Duane Beeson,
Attorney 	(Beeson, 	Tayer, 	Kovach and Silbert) 	and
Kenneth 	Absalom 	for 	California Nurses 	Association;
Hirsch Adell, 	Attorney 	(Reich, 	Adell 	and Crost) 	for American
Federation of State, 	County and Municipal Employees, 	AFL-CIO;
Douglas Barton, 	Kent Jonas 	and Terry Lewis, 	Attorneys 	(Corbett,
Kane 	and Berk) 	and James N. 	Odle, 	Attorney, 	for 	the Regents of
the 	University of 	California.
(Limited Party) 	Christine Bologna, 	Attorney 	for 	California
State 	Employees Association.
Before Tovar, Jaeger, Morgenstern and Jensen, Members.*
DECISION
Under 	subsection 	3563(a) 	of 	the Higher 	Education
Employer-Employee Relations Act 	(HEERA or A c t ) , 1 the Public
Employment 	Relations Board 	(PERB 	or 	Board) 	is 	charged with 	the
*Chairperson Gluck 	did 	not 	participate 	in 	this 	decision.
1HEERA 	is 	codified 	at 	Government 	Code 	section 	3560
et 	seq. 	All 	statutory 	references 	are 	to 	the Government Code
unless 	otherwise 	specified. 	Subsection 	3563(a) 	provides:
This 	chapter 	shall 	be 	administered 	by 	the
Public Employment 	Relations Board. 	In
administering 	this 	chapter 	the 	board 	shall
have 	all of 	the 	following 	rights, 	powers,
duties 	and 	responsibilities:
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
_______________ )

responsibility 	to 	determine 	appropriate 	units 	for
representation. 	Pursuant 	to 	that responsibility, 	hearings 	have
been 	held 	before 	administrative 	law 	judges 	of 	the Board
regarding 	petitions 	filed 	and 	positions 	taken 	by 	various 	labor
organizations 	as 	to appropriate groupings of 	employees.
Administrative 	Law Judge 	Terry Filliman 	issued 	his
recommendation 	to 	the 	Board 	regarding 	professional 	employees 	on
February 	2, 	1982. 	That 	recommendation 	is 	incorporated by
reference 	herein. 	Following 	issuance 	of 	that 	recommendation,
the 	parties 	were 	invited 	to 	brief 	their 	positions 	thereon 	to
the Board 	itself. 	After 	careful 	consideration of 	the 	record 	as
a whole, 	including 	the 	pre- 	and 	post-recommendation 	briefs 	by
the parties, 	the Board has 	determined 	that 	two units of
professional 	patient 	care 	employees 	employed 	by 	the 	Regents 	of
the University of California 	(University), 	one consisting of
all 	registered 	nurses 	and 	another 	consisting 	of 	the 	residue 	of
the professional patient care 	employees, 	constitute 	appropriate
units 	for 	meeting 	and 	conferring 	within 	the meaning 	of 	the Act.
(a) 	To determine 	in disputed cases, 	or
otherwise approve, 	appropriate units.
DISCUSSION
At 	issue 	herein 	is 	the 	unit placement 	of 	the 	approximately
5,200 	to 	6,000 	professional patient 	care 	employees 	of 	the
University. 	Four 	parties 	seek 	to 	represent 	those 	employees.
N	
2

The American Federation of 	State, 	County 	and Municipal
Employees 	(AFSCME) 	seeks 	to represent 	an overall unit of 	all
professional 	employees, 	excluding 	those 	at Lawrence Livermore
National 	Laboratory.
California 	State Employees Association 	(CSEA) 	initially
sought 	a wall-to-wall 	professional 	employees 	unit. 	CSEA does
not 	specifically modify 	this 	position 	vis-a-vis 	professional
patient care 	employees by 	its 	exceptions 	brief. 	The only
exceptions 	taken by CSEA 	regarding 	such 	employees 	go 	to whether
licensed 	vocational 	nurses 	(8916-18) 	and psychiatric
technicians 	(8925-26) 	are professional 	employees 	within 	the
meaning of 	the Act. 	Thus, 	its post-administrative law judge
(ALJ) 	recommendation position 	is 	susceptible of 	the
interpretation 	that 	it 	supports 	these ALJ's 	professional
patient care 	unit; 	however, CSEA does 	not affirmatively state
this.
United Health Care Employees, 	Service Employees
International Union, 	Locals 	535 and 660 	(SEIU) 	seeks 	two
separate 	units of patient care professional 	employees, 	one
composed 	exclusively 	of 	registered 	nurses 	and 	one 	consisting 	of
the 	1,200 	to 	2,000 	incumbents 	of 	the 	remainder 	of
classifications 	of patient 	care 	professionals.
California Nurses Association 	(CNA) 	seeks 	a 	unit of 	all
registered 	nurses. 	Alternatively, 	CNA contends 	that 	either
separate 	units 	of 	registered 	nurses 	by work 	location or 	a
systemwide 	unit 	of 	registered 	nurses 	is 	appropriate.
3

The University 	supports 	the 	comprehensive 	patient 	care
professionals 	unit 	recommended 	by 	the ALJ.
As 	indicated 	in 	our 	decision 	regarding 	professional
librarians, 	we will not 	grant 	a wall-to-wall professional
employees 	unit 	as 	sought by AFSCME 	and CSEA. 	Unit
Determination 	for 	Professional Librarians 	of 	the 	University of
California 	(9/30/82) 	PERB Decision No. 	247-H.
Evaluation of 	the other 	competing positions 	of 	the parties
requires 	us 	to 	determine 	whether 	the 	registered 	nurses 	unit 	is
appropriate, 	whether 	the 	rest of 	the patient care professionals
constitute an appropriate 	residual 	unit, 	or whether, 	due to the
totality of 	statutory 	factors, 	such 	units 	are 	inappropriate 	and
the 	only 	appropriate 	grouping 	is 	one 	of 	all 	professional
patient care 	employees.
In making 	this determination, 	we 	are guided by 	the 	criteria
of 	section 3579.2
2section 3579 provides, 	in pertinent part:
(a) 	In each case where 	the 	appropriateness
of 	a unit 	is an 	issue, 	in determining an
appropriate 	unit, 	the 	board 	shall 	take 	into
consideration all 	of 	the 	following 	criteria:
(1) 	The 	internal 	and occupational
community of 	interest 	among 	the
employees, 	including, 	but not limited
to, 	the extent 	to which 	they perform
functionally 	related 	services 	or 	work
toward 	established 	common goals, 	the
history 	of 	employee 	representation 	with
the employer, 	the 	extent 	to which such
employees 	belong 	to 	the 	same 	employee
4

organization, 	the 	extent 	to which 	the
employees have common skills, 	working
conditions, job duties, or similar
educational or 	training 	requirements,
and 	the 	extent 	to which 	the 	employees
have 	common 	supervision.
(2) 	The 	effect 	that 	the projected 	unit
will 	have on 	the meet 	and 	confer
relationships, 	emphasizing 	the
availability 	and 	authority 	of 	employer
representatives 	to deal 	effectively
with 	employee 	organizations
representing 	the 	unit, 	and 	taking 	into
account 	such 	factors 	as 	work 	location,
the numerical size of 	the 	unit, 	the
relationship of 	the 	unit 	to
organizational patterns 	of 	the 	higher
education 	employer, 	and 	the 	effect on
the 	existing 	classification 	structure
or 	existing 	classification 	schematic 	of
dividing 	a 	single 	class or 	single
classification 	schematic 	among 	two or
more units.
(3) 	The 	effect of 	the proposed 	unit on
efficient 	operations 	of 	the 	employer
and 	the 	compatibility of 	the 	unit with
the 	responsibility of 	the 	higher
education employer 	and 	its 	employees 	to
serve 	students 	and 	the 	public.
(4) 	The 	number of 	employees 	and
classifications 	in a proposed unit, 	and
its 	effect on 	the 	operations 	of 	the
employer, on the objectives of
providing 	the 	employees 	the 	right 	to
effective 	representation, 	and on 	the
meet 	and 	confer 	relationship.
(5) 	The 	impact on 	the meet 	and 	confer
relationship 	created 	by 	fragmentation
of 	employee 	groups or 	any proliferation
Initially, 	we 	hold 	that only systemwide 	units 	of 	patient
care professionals are 	appropriate. 	This 	is 	in 	keeping with
55

the presumption embodied 	in 	subsection 	3579(c). 	Only CNA 	seeks
smaller 	groupings 	of 	registered 	nurses, 	and 	the 	evidence 	and
arguments 	presented 	urging 	facility-wide 	units 	are 	insufficient
to 	rebut 	the 	presumption 	favoring 	systemwide 	units.3
of 	units 	among 	the 	employees 	of 	the
employer.
(b) 	There 	shall be 	a presumption 	that
professional 	employees 	and 	nonprofessional
employees 	shall 	not 	be 	included 	in 	the 	same
representation unit. 	However, 	the
presumption shall be 	rebuttable, 	depending
upon what 	the 	evidence 	pertinent 	to 	the
criteria 	set 	forth 	in 	subdivision 	(a)
establishes.
(c) 	There 	shall be 	a presumption 	that 	all
employees 	within an occupational 	group or
groups 	shall 	be 	included 	within 	a 	single
representation unit. 	However, 	the
presumption 	shall be 	rebutted 	if 	there 	is 	a
preponderance 	of 	evidence 	that 	a 	single
representation 	unit 	is 	inconsistent 	with 	the
criteria 	set 	forth 	in subdivision 	(a) 	or 	the
purposes of 	this chapter.
Registered 	Nurses
Looking 	to 	the 	community of 	interest 	factors 	enumerated 	in
the 	statute, 	it 	is clear 	that 	registered nurses 	share a 	strong
internal 	and 	occupational 	community of 	interest. 	They perform
patient 	care 	and 	closely 	related 	services 	toward 	the 	common
goal of 	patient 	health. 	While 	this 	function 	is performed 	in
concert 	with other 	patient 	care 	professionals, 	that 	interaction
3We 	note 	that 	CNA 	alternatively 	supports 	systemwide 	units
of 	registered 	nurses.
6
• 	• 	• 	• 	• 	• 	• 	• 	• 	• 	• 	• 	•
6

does not, 	in itself, 	indicate a community of 	interest shared by
all patient care professionals 	so strong 	as 	to render 	a
discrete 	unit 	of 	registered 	nurses 	inappropriate. 	Registered
nurses 	come 	into contact 	with 	a 	variety of 	other 	patient 	care
professionals 	from time 	to 	time 	and 	to varying degrees. 	This
contact 	is 	not 	so intense 	or of 	such 	duration as 	to link 	them
inextricably with other 	patient care professionals. 	Rather, 	it
is largely a 	function of 	the 	unique 	coordinative 	role which
registered 	nurses play 	in patient 	care, 	a role which
differentiates 	them 	from other 	patient 	care 	employees, 	who
characteristically play 	an 	equally 	important 	but 	more
specialized 	role 	in 	the 	course of 	patient 	treatment.
Registered 	nurses 	are 	subject 	to 	a 	comprehensive 	regulatory
scheme 	governing 	their 	training 	and 	licensure. 	They 	are
subject 	to a 	separate 	body of 	law, 	the Nursing Practice Act.
Business 	and Professions Code, 	Section 	2700 	et 	seq. 	A separate
Board 	of 	Registered 	Nursing 	administers 	the 	provisions 	of 	that
Act. 	This unique, comprehensive 	regulatory scheme, 	governing
the 	initial 	and 	continuing 	requirements 	for 	licensure 	and
qualification 	to practice, 	differentiates 	registered 	nurses
from 	the 	other 	patient 	care 	professionals 	at 	issue 	herein.
We note that, 	by law, 	nursing services 	in accredited
hospitals 	and 	health 	care 	facilities must 	be 	under 	the
direction of 	a 	registered 	nurse. 	California Administrative
Code, 	title 	22, 	division 	5, 	section 70215. 	The record does not
7

indicate 	that 	all 	registered 	nurses 	systemwide 	have 	common
reporting or 	supervision patterns, 	or 	that 	other 	patient 	care
professionals 	systemwide 	report 	to or 	are 	supervised 	by
different persons 	than are 	the 	registered 	nurses. 	However, 	the
predominant 	pattern 	is 	that 	the majority 	of 	registered 	nurses
report 	to a director 	of 	nursing or 	an 	associate director 	of
nursing 	at a given facility, 	through 	the 	head 	nurse 	of 	the
specific department 	in which 	they work. 	Generally, 	authority
for 	hiring, 	firing, 	scheduling, 	and discipline of registered
nurses 	is 	exercised 	by 	a 	separate 	administrative 	nursing
structure 	in a given health 	care 	facility, 	through 	the 	director
or 	associate director 	of 	nursing or 	the 	designee 	thereof.
As 	with 	administrative 	and 	supervisory 	patterns, 	the 	hours
of 	work 	and 	other 	terms 	and 	conditions 	of patient 	care
professionals 	do not 	neatly 	break 	down 	along 	lines 	of
registered 	nurses 	versus 	other 	patient 	care professionals.
However, 	the 	record 	reflects 	the predominant 	pattern 	that,
while 	other 	patient 	care 	professionals 	generally work 	a 	regular
day 	shift, 	registered 	nurses 	typically provide 	24-hour 	coverage
and 	thus 	are 	employed on a variety of 	shifts, 	day and 	night.
Registered 	nurses 	generally 	are 	eligible 	for 	overtime 	pay,
whereas 	most other 	patient 	care 	professionals 	are 	not.
Registered 	nurses 	are 	generally 	hourly 	paid, 	whereas most 	other
patient 	care professionals 	are 	salaried. 	Unique 	scheduling 	and
transfer 	policies 	apply 	to 	registered 	nurses. 	They 	alone 	among
8

patient 	care 	professionals 	have 	arranged 	at 	certain 	facilities
to work 	12-hour 	shifts.
Because of 	the different 	factual patterns presented, 	we
find 	no case 	law which 	is 	directly on point. 	However, 	we
accord 	some 	weight 	to 	the 	fact 	that 	the National 	Labor
Relations Board 	routinely 	grants 	separate 	units 	of 	registered
nurses 	when 	requested, 	and 	that 	such 	units 	are 	therefore 	a
common 	aspect 	of 	the 	pattern of 	representation 	in 	the private
sector 	health care 	industry. 	See, 	for 	example,
Newton-Wellesley Hospital 	(1980) 	250 NLRB 	409 	[104 	LRRM 	1384]
and cases 	cited 	therein. 	Further, 	in 	the only other
institutional 	unit 	in which 	a 	separate 	registered 	nurse 	unit
has 	been requested, 	we granted 	such 	a 	unit. 	Unit Determination
for 	the State of California 	(11/7/79) 	PERB Decision No. 	110-S.
A 	unit 	of 	registered 	nurses 	would 	contain 	approximately
4,000 	of 	the 	approximately 	5,200 	patient 	care 	professionals,
systemwide. 	It would 	not 	involve 	dividing 	a 	single class 	among
two or more 	units.
Further, 	the 	record does 	not 	reflect 	that 	creation of 	such
a 	sizeable 	unit, 	which would leave open 	the 	possibility 	of 	a
total of 	perhaps 	three 	systemwide 	units 	of 	patient 	care
professionals, 	would 	have an adverse 	effect 	upon 	efficient
operations 	of 	the University. 	This 	unit would 	not 	deprive
employees 	of 	the 	right 	to 	effective 	representation.
99

The University raises 	the 	specter 	of 	separate 	units 	of 	each
patient 	care 	discipline 	should 	the 	Board 	create 	a 	separate 	unit
of 	registered 	nurses. 	We 	agree 	that 	such 	a 	scenario would 	run
afoul of 	the 	statutory proviso 	against 	undue 	unit
proliferation. 	It does 	not 	follow 	that once 	registered 	nurses
receive 	a separate 	unit, 	each 	classification must 	therefore
receive 	its own. 	Statutory 	criteria militate 	against 	such 	unit
proliferation, 	and we would 	not 	be 	disposed 	to grant 	such 	small
unit 	fragments 	even 	if 	such 	were 	petitioned 	for.
In 	recognition of 	their 	internal 	and 	occupational 	community
of 	interest 	and 	in consideration of 	a 	balancing 	of 	the 	other
statutory criteria, 	we conclude 	that 	a separate 	unit of
registered 	nurses 	is 	appropriate. 	Said 	unit 	shall 	consist of
all 	registered 	nurses 	systemwide.
CSEA contends 	in 	its 	exceptions 	that licensed 	vocational
nurses 	(LVN's) 	are professional employees. 	All other 	parties
are 	in 	agreement 	as 	to 	their 	nonprofessional 	status. 	We 	find
no 	indication 	in 	the 	record 	that 	LVN's meet 	the 	criteria 	set
forth 	in subsection 	3562(o) 	for 	professional 	employees.
Rather, 	we shall place 	them 	in 	the patient 	care 	technical
unit. 	See Unit Determination for 	Technical Employees 	of 	the
University of California 	(9/30/82) 	PERB Decision No. 	241-H.
Residual 	Patient Care 	Professional Employees
Because 	we 	have 	dismissed AFSCME's 	"all 	professional
employees" 	petition and 	granted 	the 	registered 	nurses 	unit, 	the
10

remaining 	request 	for 	professional 	patient 	care 	employees 	is
SEIU's 	residual 	unit 	request.
We find 	that 	the 	employees 	in 	this 	requested 	unit 	share 	a
common 	goal 	and 	perform 	functionally 	related 	patient 	care
services. 	All possess 	advanced 	training 	and 	experience 	and/or
education 	which 	enables 	them 	to 	provide 	specialized 	patient
care. 	All work 	in medical 	settings, 	some performing 	"hands-on"
patient 	care 	and 	others 	performing 	vital 	laboratory 	functions
in 	furtherance of 	the 	common health care goal.
Having 	granted 	the 	requested 	unit 	of 	registered 	nurses, 	it
is deemed 	appropriate 	to grant 	the 	requested 	residual 	unit.
This 	unit, 	containing 	as 	it does 	the bulk of 	the 	remaining
patient 	care professionals, 	will 	serve 	the 	statutory goal of
avoiding 	impairment 	of 	the University's 	operational 	efficiency
and 	avoid potential 	undue 	unit proliferation. 	It will 	further
provide 	employees 	with 	their 	right 	to 	units 	in which 	they may
be 	effectively 	represented.
SEIU 	initially did 	not 	seek 	to 	include 	pharmacist
classifications 	in 	the 	residual 	unit. 	In 	their 	exceptions
brief, 	they 	indicated 	that 	they would 	seek 	to 	represent 	them 	in
the 	residual 	unit 	if 	the Board ordered 	their 	inclusion. 	The
record 	reflects 	that pharmacists, 	like others 	sought 	in 	this
unit, 	provide 	specialized 	professional health 	care 	services.
Their 	work 	takes 	them 	into 	the 	clinics 	and 	hospitals 	to
interact with other 	patient 	care 	professionals. 	It does 	not
11

appear 	that 	they would 	constitute 	an 	appropriate 	unit 	by
themselves. 	Thus, 	because 	the 	record reflects 	that 	they share
an 	internal 	and 	occupational 	community 	of 	interest 	with 	other
patient 	care professionals, 	we 	shall order 	their 	inclusion 	in
the 	residual 	patient 	care 	professional 	unit.
Physicians
No labor 	organization 	sought 	to 	represent physicians 	in 	a
professional 	patient 	care 	unit. 	SEIU 	strenuously objects 	to
their 	inclusion on community of 	interest 	grounds. 	The
University 	contends 	that 	they 	should 	be 	included. 	Because 	no
labor 	organization sought 	to 	represent 	them 	in 	the 	course 	of
this 	proceeding 	and 	because 	the 	record 	and 	precedent 	supports
the appropriateness of 	a separate physicians 	unit, 	we 	shall
leave 	them 	ununitted 	for 	the 	present. 	See Unit Determination
for Employees 	of 	the 	California State 	University and 	Colleges
(HEERA) 	(Professional) 	(9/22/81) 	PERB Decision No. 	173-H.
The 	record 	reflects 	that 	the 	various 	classes 	of 	doctors 	on
the University's 	payroll 	have 	licensure 	and 	regulatory
requirements 	which 	differentiate 	them 	from 	other 	professional
patient 	care 	employees. 	They 	are 	far 	more 	independent 	than 	any
other 	health 	care 	employees, 	setting 	their 	own day-to-day
working 	conditions 	to 	a far 	greater 	extent. 	Due 	to 	their
special 	role 	in 	health care, 	they perform quasi-supervisory
functions, 	directing 	the work 	of 	other 	patient 	care
professionals. 	In recognition of 	the 	above 	community of
12

interest 	factors, 	PERB has 	granted physicians 	separate 	units 	in
other 	institutional 	settings. 	See Unit Determination 	for 	the
State of California, 	supra; 	Unit Determination for Employees 	of
the California State University and Colleges, 	supra. 	Thus,
failing 	to 	unit 	these 	employees 	now will not 	prevent 	them 	from
exercising 	their 	right 	to 	remain 	unrepresented 	or 	to
effectively 	seek 	exclusive 	representation 	should 	they 	desire 	to
do so in 	the 	future.
The University contends 	that 	hospital 	laboratory
technicians 	are 	professional 	employees. 	For 	the 	reasons 	set
forth 	in Unit Determination 	for 	Technical Employees 	of 	the
University of California, 	supra, 	we find 	them to be
nonprofessional 	employees 	and 	accordingly place 	them 	in 	the
technical 	patient 	care 	unit.
CSEA 	contends 	that 	psychiatric 	technicians 	are 	professional
employees. 	As with licensed 	vocational nurses, 	we 	find
insufficient 	support 	in 	the 	record 	for 	the 	proposition 	that
they 	possess 	the 	indicia 	of 	professional 	status 	set 	forth 	in
subsection 3562(o). 	Thus, 	we shall place them 	in the patient
care 	and 	technical 	unit.
ORDER
Based upon 	the entire 	record 	in 	this case, 	the Public
Employment 	Relations 	Board 	hereby ORDERS 	that:
1. 	A 	unit 	of 	all 	registered 	nurses 	employed 	by 	the
Regents of 	the University of California, 	as 	listed 	in
13

Appendix A 	attached 	hereto, 	is 	an 	appropriate 	unit 	for meeting
and 	conferring 	within 	the meaning 	of 	the Act;
2. 	A 	unit 	of 	all 	other 	professional 	patient care
employees, 	excluding physicians, 	employed by the Regents of 	the
University of California, 	as 	listed 	in Appendix B attached
hereto, 	is 	an appropriate 	unit 	for meeting 	and conferring
within 	the meaning of 	the Act;
3. 	Each 	of 	the 	units 	found 	appropriate 	shall 	exclude
managerial, 	supervisory, 	and confidential 	employees of 	the
Regents 	of 	the University of 	California;
4. 	Any 	technical 	errors 	in 	this ORDER shall 	be 	presented
to 	the 	director 	of 	representation who 	shall 	take 	appropriate
action 	thereon 	in 	accord 	with 	this 	decision;
5. 	The Board hereby ORDERS 	a 	representation 	election 	in
each of 	these 	units, 	and 	the general counsel 	is 	hereby directed
to proceed 	in 	accordance 	with 	California Administrative 	Code,
title 8, 	part 3, 	division 4.
By 	the 	BOARD
Member Jaeger, 	concurring 	and dissenting: 	I 	concur 	with 	the
majority opinion, 	except 	that, 	for 	the 	reasons expressed 	in 	the
administrative 	law judge's 	recommendation, 	I 	would find 	that 	a
separate 	unit 	of 	registered 	nurses 	is 	inappropriate.
14

APPENDIX 	A
Registered 	Nurses
a) 	Lawrence 	Berkeley Lab
732.1 	Occupational Health Nurse 	I
732.2 	Occupational Health Nurse II
742.1 	Nurse
b) 	University
9119 	Special 	Duty Nurse
9133 	Administrative 	Nurse 	II
9134 	Administrative Nurse 	I
9136 	Clinical 	Nurse V
9137 	Clinical Nurse 	IV
9138 	Clinical Nurse 	III
9139 	Clinical Nurse 	II
9140 	Clinical Nurse 	I
9143 	Senior 	Nurse 	Anesthetist
9144 	Nurse Anesthetist
9146 	Nurse 	Practitioner 	III
9147 	Nurse 	Practitioner 	II
9148 	Nurse 	Practitioner 	I
l

APPENDIX 	B
Residual 	Patient Care
Professional 	Unit
a) 	Lawrence Berkeley Lab
731.1 	Medical Lab 	Technologist 	I
731.2 	Medical 	Lab 	Technologist 	II
743.1 	Research 	Clinical 	Lab 	Technologist
b) 	University
5412 	Senior 	Dietitian
5413 	Dietitian
8938 	Senior 	Clinical 	Lab 	Technologist Specialist
8939 	Clinical 	Lab 	Technologist 	Specialist
8940 	Clinical 	Lab 	Technologist
8950 	Consulting 	Toxicologist
8957 	Clinical 	laboratory Technologist Apprentice
8958 	Blood 	Bank 	Trainee
8982 	Senior Orthopedist
8983 	Orthopedist
9233 	Pharmacist 	- Abolished
9240 	Hospital Radiation 	Physicist
9241 	Assistant Hospital 	Radiation Physicist
9244 	Assistant Chief, 	Pharmaceutical Services
9245 	Pharmacist Specialist
9246 	Senior 	Pharmacist
9247 	Staff 	Pharmacist 	II
9248 	Staff 	Pharmacist 	I
9313 	Clinical 	Social Worker 	III
9314 	Clinical 	Social Worker 	II
9315 	Clinical 	Social 	Worker 	I
9341 	Social Worker 	Associate
9342 	Assistant 	Social 	Worker 	Associate
9382 	Psychologist 	III
9383 	Psychologist 	II
9384 	Psychologist 	I
9392 	Senior 	Psychometrist
9393 	Psychometrist
9449 	Associate Chief 	of 	Rehabilitation 	Services
9451 	Music 	Therapist
9458 	Athletic 	Trainer
9462 	Senior 	Physical 	Therapist
9463 	Physical 	Therapist
9464 	Special 	Duty 	Physical 	Therapist
9466 	Recreation Therapist
11

APPENDIX 	B 	(Con't)
9472 	Senior 	Speech 	Pathologist
9473 	Speech 	Pathologist
9474 	Senior 	Audiologist
9475 	Audiologist
9477 	Reading 	Therapist
9493 	Senior 	Occupational Therapist
9494 	Occupational 	Therapist
2
2