CourtListener 10608157•Courtney Young v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Company
Courtney Young v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Company
CourtListener 10608157Arkctapp9 dic 2020
Testo completo
Cite as 2020 Ark. App. 575
Reason: I attest to the
accuracy and integrity of this
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
document
No. CV-20-201
Date: 2021-08-23 14:10:07
Foxit PhantomPDF Version:
9.7.5
Opinion Delivered: December 9, 2020
COURTNEY YOUNG APPEAL FROM THE PHILLIPS
APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
[NO. 54CV-17-324]
V.
HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER W.
MORLEDGE, JUDGE
SHELTER MUTUAL INSURANCE
COMPANY SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE
APPELLEE ORDERED
PER CURIAM
We have pending before this court a motion filed by the appellant, Courtney Young,
to strike supplemental addendum and arguments pertaining to the supplemental addendum
contained in the response brief filed by the appellee, Shelter Mutual Insurance Company.
For the reasons set forth in this per curiam, we order appellee to file a supplemental response.
Appellant alleges that appellee’s supplemental addendum contains documents that are
not contained in the record on appeal and therefore must be struck. Appellee responded in
pertinent part by stating, “There is no question Supplemental Addendum Nos. 1 through
16 were and are a part of the record.” However, appellee does not identify the page
numbers where these documents are located in the record on appeal. Thus, we order
appellee to file a supplemental response within seven (7) calendar days and identify the page
number(s) in the record on appeal where the exhibits referred to as “Supplemental
Addendum Nos. 1 through 16” are located.
Supplemental response ordered.
David A. Hodges, for appellant.
Matthews, Sanders & Sayes, P.A., by: James T. Sayes, for appellee.
2
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.