Questione giuridica chiave
Whether the revision should be admitted for fundamental importance under § 132(2)(1) VwGO on the question of piercing res judicata of an administrative mandatory judgment by reference to § 826 BGB in refugee law.
Decisione estratta
The complaint is well-founded; the revision is admitted because the case raises a question of fundamental importance requiring clarification.
Motivazione estratta
The Federal Administrative Court held that the appeal can clarify whether and, if so, under what conditions the res judicata effect of a mandatory judgment in administrative proceedings may be overcome in refugee law by invoking § 826 BGB.