progetti

Revision allowed over state subsidy for Jewish community

BVerwG 6 B 16/12, 6 B 16/12 (6 C 19/12)Bverwg / 6a divisione9 ago 2012Granted

Apri la fonte

Estratto da Omnilex

Sintesi Omnilex

The Federal Administrative Court upheld the defendant’s complaint against the non-admission of revision. It found that the case raises a question of fundamental importance: whether a treaty rule on a state subsidy for Jewish communities can be interpreted in a way that leaves decisive distribution criteria to the exclusive assessment of a third party, and whether this is compatible with the judicial guarantee under Articles 20(3) and 92 GG.

Massima Omnilex

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; fundamental importance of a case exists where the appeal would clarify a legally unresolved question capable of general clarification. This may also be the case when the compatibility of an interpretation of a treaty-based subsidy regime with the judicial guarantee under Art. 20 Abs. 3 GG in conjunction with Art. 92 GG is in dispute, particularly if essential determining criteria are assigned to the exclusive assessment of a third party. The admissibility threshold is met when the legal question is formulated in a generalizable manner and is decisive for the outcome (consid. 1).

Testo completo

BVerwG — 6 B 16/12, 6 B 16/12 (6 C 19/12), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2012-08-09

Aktenzeichen: 6 B 16/12, 6 B 16/12 (6 C 19/12)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: Art 20 Abs 3 GG, Art 92 GG, § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Oberverwaltungsgericht des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt, 20. Juli 2011, Az: 3 L 165/10, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 6. Senat

Titelzeile

Revisionszulassung; Landeszuschuss für jüdische Gemeinde

Gründe

1 Die Beschwerde des Beklagten gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision ist begründet. Die Rechtssache hat die sinngemäß geltend gemachte grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne des § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO. Sie kann zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, ob es mit der Justizgewährungspflicht (Art. 20 Abs. 3 GG i.V.m. Art. 92 GG) vereinbar ist, wenn eine staatsvertragliche Regelung über einen Landeszuschuss für jüdische Gemeinden dahin ausgelegt wird, dass für die Verteilung maßgebliche Erfordernisse der ausschließlichen Prüfungskompetenz eines Dritten unterliegen.

Parole chiave

revision admissibilityfundamental importancejudicial guaranteestate subsidyJewish communitythird-party assessment

Estratto da Omnilex

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Omnilex

Questione giuridica chiave

Whether the revision should be admitted for fundamental importance under Section 132(2)(1) VwGO.

Decisione estratta

Yes. The complaint is well-founded because the case raises a question of fundamental importance concerning whether a treaty-based rule on a state subsidy for Jewish communities may be interpreted so that decisive requirements are left to the exclusive assessment of a third party.

Motivazione estratta

The court held that the asserted question could clarify compatibility with the judicial guarantee under Article 20(3) in conjunction with Article 92 of the Basic Law, and therefore met the threshold of fundamental importance.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.