progetti

Plan approval defect: preservation for part of project

BVerwG 7 B 44/11, 7 B 44/11 (7 C 10/12)Bverwg / Division 728 mar 2012Granted

Apri la fonte

Estratto da Omnilex

Sintesi Omnilex

The Federal Administrative Court upheld the complaint against the denial of leave to appeal in a planning approval dispute. It held that the case raises a question of fundamental importance concerning the reach of § 75(1a) sentence 2 VwVfG, namely whether plan preservation is possible only for part of a project. The complaint was therefore successful.

Massima Omnilex

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; § 75 Abs. 1a S. 2 VwVfG; fundamental importance of the question whether plan preservation may extend only to part of a project. A complaint against the refusal of leave to appeal is well-founded where the appeal proceedings are expected to clarify an unresolved question on the scope of the plan-preservation provision. The existence of a need for clarification is sufficient; it is not required that the answer be already evident from the statute or settled case law.

Testo completo

BVerwG — 7 B 44/11, 7 B 44/11 (7 C 10/12), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2012-03-28

Aktenzeichen: 7 B 44/11, 7 B 44/11 (7 C 10/12)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 75 Abs 1a S 2 VwVfG

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen, 15. März 2011, Az: 20 A 2147/09, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 7. Senat

Titelzeile

Planfeststellungsbeschluss; Planerhaltung bei Abwägungsmangel

Gründe

1 Die Beschwerde der Beigeladenen gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem angefochtenen Urteil ist begründet. Die Rechtssache hat grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne des § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO. Sie wirft voraussichtlich u.a. die klärungsbedürftige Frage auf, inwieweit § 75 Abs. 1a Satz 2 VwVfG die Planerhaltung für einen Teil des Vorhabens ermöglicht.

Parole chiave

planning approvalplan preservationnon-admission complaintfundamental importancepartial projectadministrative procedure

Estratto da Omnilex

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Omnilex

Questione giuridica chiave

Whether leave to appeal should be granted because the case raises a fundamental question about § 75(1a) sentence 2 VwVfG and partial plan preservation.

Decisione estratta

Yes. The complaint was well-founded because the case raised a question of fundamental importance, namely to what extent § 75(1a) sentence 2 VwVfG allows preservation of a plan for only part of the project.

Motivazione estratta

The court found the legal question unresolved and worthy of clarification in revision proceedings.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.