Scope of cost reimbursement under § 89a(3) SGB VIII

BVerwG 5 B 36/11, 5 B 36/11 (5 C 25/11)Bverwg / 5a divisione22 dic 2011Granted

Estratto da Omnilex

Sintesi Omnilex

The Federal Administrative Court admitted the revision against a judgment of the Administrative Courtshof Baden-Württemberg in a dispute over reimbursement of costs between public youth welfare authorities. It held that the matter is of fundamental importance because the revision may clarify the scope of § 89a(3) SGB VIII.

Massima Omnilex

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; admission of revision for fundamental importance: Revision is to be admitted where the case is capable of clarifying the scope and application of a provision of federal law of recurring significance. In a dispute over inter-authority cost reimbursement under § 89a Abs. 3 SGB VIII, the need for clarification of the statutory reimbursement regime may satisfy the requirement of grundsätzliche Bedeutung (consid. 1).

Testo completo

BVerwG — 5 B 36/11, 5 B 36/11 (5 C 25/11), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2011-12-22

Aktenzeichen: 5 B 36/11, 5 B 36/11 (5 C 25/11)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 89a Abs 3 SGB 8

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Verwaltungsgerichtshof Baden-Württemberg, 16. Februar 2011, Az: 12 S 1608/08, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 5. Senat

Titelzeile

Kostenerstattung zwischen öffentlichen Jugendhilfeträgern

Gründe

1 Die Revision gegen das Urteil des Verwaltungsgerichtshofs Baden-Württemberg vom 16. Februar 2011 ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit geben, den Anwendungsbereich der Kostenerstattungsregelung des § 89a Abs. 3 SGB VIII zu klären.

Parole chiave

cost reimbursementyouth welfarerevision admissibilityfundamental importancestatutory interpretation

Estratto da Omnilex

Questione giuridica chiave

Whether revision should be admitted for the case concerning cost reimbursement between public youth welfare authorities under § 89a(3) SGB VIII.

Decisione estratta

Revision was admitted because the case raises a question of fundamental importance and may clarify the scope of § 89a(3) SGB VIII.

Motivazione estratta

The Court considered that the revision could give the Senate an opportunity to clarify the application of the cost-reimbursement rule in § 89a(3) SGB VIII.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.