progetti

Leave to appeal on zoning justification for central retail areas

BVerwG 4 B 8/11, 4 B 8/11 (4 C 13/11)Bverwg / 4a divisione29 nov 2011Granted

Apri la fonte

Estratto da Omnilex

Sintesi Omnilex

The Federal Administrative Court upheld a complaint and allowed revision under § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO. The court held that the proceedings could help clarify what requirements apply to the urban-planning justification of zoning rules designed to strengthen central retail areas. It also fixed the dispute value for the complaint and, provisionally, for the revision proceedings under the GKG.

Massima Omnilex

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; revision admissibility for questions concerning the urban-planning justification of land-use plan provisions strengthening central retail areas. A revision is to be allowed where the appeal proceedings can contribute to clarifying the requirements of the statutory justification of such planning determinations and the question is of fundamental significance. Dispute value determinations are made under §§ 47, 52, 63 GKG.

Testo completo

BVerwG — 4 B 8/11, 4 B 8/11 (4 C 13/11), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2011-11-29

Aktenzeichen: 4 B 8/11, 4 B 8/11 (4 C 13/11)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen, 7. Dezember 2010, Az: 10 A 332/08, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Titelzeile

Revisionszulassung; Anforderungen an die städtebauliche Rechtfertigung bauleitplanerischer Festsetzungen zur Stärkung zentraler Versorgungsbereiche

Gründe

1 Die Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen, weil das Revisionsverfahren zur Klärung der Frage beitragen kann, welche Anforderungen an die städtebauliche Rechtfertigung bauleitplanerischer Festsetzungen zur Stärkung von zentralen Versorgungsbereichen zu stellen sind.

2 Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.

Parole chiave

revision admissibilityfundamental significanceurban planningzoningcentral retail areasdispute value

Estratto da Omnilex

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Omnilex

Questione giuridica chiave

Whether revision should be allowed because the case raises a question about the requirements for the planning justification of zoning provisions aimed at strengthening central retail areas.

Decisione estratta

Revision was admitted because the appeal proceedings could clarify the legal requirements for the urban-planning justification of such zoning provisions.

Motivazione estratta

The question is capable of contributing to clarification of a matter of fundamental significance under § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.