progetti

Subsidy notice by development bank via house bank

BVerwG 3 B 2/11, 3 B 2/11 (3 C 12/11)Bverwg / 3a divisione16 feb 2011Granted

Apri la fonte

Estratto da Omnilex

Sintesi Omnilex

The Federal Administrative Court allowed the complaint against the Thuringian Higher Administrative Court's judgment and admitted revision. It considered the case to have fundamental importance because the revision should clarify whether a state development bank's decision to grant a subsidy, communicated only by forwarding the contractual documents to the house bank as messenger, constitutes an administrative act. The court also made a provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Massima Omnilex

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; admissibility of revision for fundamental importance in subsidy cases. A question of fundamental importance exists where it is necessary to clarify in revision whether a public development bank's decision to grant a subsidy, communicated solely through the recipient's house bank as messenger and not separately to the addressee, constitutes an administrative act within the meaning of § 35 VwVfG. The relevance of the legal characterization depends on the mode of external manifestation of the authority's decision, not merely on its substantive content. Where the lower court's reasoning leaves this issue open, revision may be admitted to secure uniform application of the law.

Testo completo

BVerwG — 3 B 2/11, 3 B 2/11 (3 C 12/11), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2011-02-16

Aktenzeichen: 3 B 2/11, 3 B 2/11 (3 C 12/11)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO, § 35 VwVfG

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Thüringer Oberverwaltungsgericht, 29. Juni 2010, Az: 3 KO 524/08, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 3. Senat

Titelzeile

Subventionsgewährung durch Landesförderbank; Verwaltungsakt; Verlautbarung gegenüber Hausbank des Zuwendungsempfängers; Revisionszulassung

Gründe

1 Die Beschwerde hat Erfolg. Der Rechtssache kommt die von der Beklagten dargelegte grundsätzliche Bedeutung zu (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Im Revisionsverfahren wird voraussichtlich die Frage zu klären sein, ob die Entscheidung der öffentlichen Förderbank eines Landes, auf einen ihr durch die Hausbank als Botin übermittelten Antrag hin eine Subvention zu gewähren, einen Verwaltungsakt darstellt, wenn diese Entscheidung nicht gesondert und gegenüber dem Zuwendungsempfänger, sondern im Wege der Übersendung der zur Durchführung der Subvention vorgesehenen Vertragsunterlagen an die Hausbank verlautbart wird.

2 Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.

Parole chiave

subsidyadministrative actdevelopment bankcommunicationhouse bankrevision admissionfundamental importance

Estratto da Omnilex

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Omnilex

Questione giuridica chiave

Whether the case raises grounds for admission of revision because a subsidy decision by a state development bank communicated via the house bank qualifies as an administrative act.

Decisione estratta

The complaint succeeds because the case has fundamental importance; revision is to clarify whether such communication amounts to an administrative act.

Motivazione estratta

The court saw a need to answer whether a public development bank's decision to grant a subsidy, communicated not separately to the beneficiary but through sending the contractual documents to the house bank, constitutes an administrative act under the Administrative Procedure Act.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.