progetti

Revision admitted on telecom fee trust protection question

BVerwG 6 B 39/10, 6 B 39/10 (6 C 3/11)Bverwg / 6a divisione19 gen 2011Granted

Apri la fonte

Estratto da Omnilex

Sintesi Omnilex

In a non-admission complaint in a telecom regulation case, the Federal Administrative Court held that the matter has fundamental importance. The unresolved question was whether a temporary approval of wholesale access charges gives competitors reliance protection with respect to a later approval of higher charges for the remaining period. The complaint by the third party was therefore successful.

Massima Omnilex

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; fundamental importance in leave-to-appeal proceedings. A complaint against refusal of leave to appeal is justified where the case is capable of clarifying a legally unresolved question of general significance. In regulated telecommunications pricing, this may be the case where it is unclear whether a time-limited approval of wholesale charges affords competitors reliance protection for the later approval of higher charges for the residual period (consid. 1).

Testo completo

BVerwG — 6 B 39/10, 6 B 39/10 (6 C 3/11), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2011-01-19

Aktenzeichen: 6 B 39/10, 6 B 39/10 (6 C 3/11)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: TKG 2004, § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO

Vorinstanz: vorgehend VG Köln, 22. April 2010, Az: 1 K 6275/09, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 6. Senat

Titelzeile

Nichtzulassungsbeschwerde; Telekommunikation; Regulierung; Vorleistungsentgelt

Gründe

1 Die Beschwerde der Beigeladenen gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision ist begründet. Die Rechtssache hat grundsätzliche Bedeutung (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Sie kann zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, inwieweit eine dem regulierten Unternehmen erteilte befristete Genehmigung von Vorleistungsentgelten Vertrauensschutz zugunsten der Wettbewerber im Hinblick auf eine später für den Restzeitraum erteilte Genehmigung höherer Entgelte entfaltet.

2 Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 und 3 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 3 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG).

Parole chiave

telecommunicationsregulationwholesale chargesleave to appealfundamental importancereliance protection

Estratto da Omnilex

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Omnilex

Questione giuridica chiave

Whether leave to appeal should be granted because the case raises a question of fundamental importance under § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO.

Decisione estratta

Yes. The complaint was well-founded because the case could clarify whether a time-limited approval of wholesale charges creates reliance protection for competitors regarding a later higher approval for the remaining period.

Motivazione estratta

The court found that the unresolved reliance-protection question in regulated telecom pricing has significance beyond the individual case and can guide future cases.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.