progetti

Clarification of § 45(9) StVO for truck traffic restrictions

BVerwG 3 B 30/10, 3 B 30/10 (3 C 40/10)Bverwg / 3a divisione21 dic 2010Granted

Apri la fonte

Estratto da Omnilex

Sintesi Omnilex

The Federal Administrative Court upheld the complaint against the refusal to admit revision. It held that the case raises a question of fundamental importance: what legal significance attaches to a traffic restriction measure under § 45(9) sentence 3 StVO when it not only diverts toll-avoiding traffic but also restricts heavy goods traffic already present on the route. The court indicated that the revision would likely permit further clarification in light of its earlier judgment in BVerwG 3 C 18.07.

Massima Omnilex

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; fundamental importance of a complaint against denial of leave to appeal in a traffic-restriction case under § 45 Abs. 9 S. 3 StVO. A question is of fundamental importance where the revision proceedings are likely to afford an opportunity to clarify, in a legally significant way, the scope and limits of a traffic measure whose effects extend beyond diverting toll-avoidance traffic and also reach pre-existing heavy-lorry traffic on the route. The decisive point is the unresolved legal significance of that additional restrictive effect; continuation of prior case-law may be required (consid. 2).

Testo completo

BVerwG — 3 B 30/10, 3 B 30/10 (3 C 40/10), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-12-21

Aktenzeichen: 3 B 30/10, 3 B 30/10 (3 C 40/10)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 45 Abs 9 S 3 StVO

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof, 18. Januar 2010, Az: 11 BV 08.791, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 3. Senat

Titelzeile

Beschränkungen oder Verbote des fließenden Verkehrs

Gründe

1 Die Beschwerde hat Erfolg. Der Rechtssache kommt grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne von § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zu.

2 Das Revisionsverfahren wird dem Senat voraussichtlich Gelegenheit geben, im Anschluss an sein Urteil vom 13. März 2008 - BVerwG 3 C 18.07 - (BVerwGE 130, 383) die Frage weiter zu klären, welche rechtliche Bedeutung dem Umstand zukommt, dass eine auf § 45 Abs. 9 Satz 3 StVO gestützte Maßnahme nicht nur den Mautausweichverkehr, sondern darüber hinaus auch den bereits zuvor auf der Strecke vorhandenen Schwerlastverkehr unterbindet.

Parole chiave

traffic restrictionheavy goods vehiclesfundamental importanceleave to appealroad traffic regulation

Estratto da Omnilex

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Omnilex

Questione giuridica chiave

Whether the complaint should be admitted because the case has fundamental importance.

Decisione estratta

Yes. The complaint succeeded because the matter raises a question of fundamental importance under § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO.

Motivazione estratta

The revision proceedings will likely allow further clarification, in continuation of BVerwG 3 C 18.07, of the legal significance of the fact that a measure based on § 45(9) sentence 3 StVO not only diverts toll-avoiding traffic but also restricts heavy-lorry traffic already using the route.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.