BVerwG 7 B 13/16, 7 B 13/16 (7 C 22/17)•Leave to appeal on NGO environmental standing and jurisdiction objections
BVerwG 7 B 13/16, 7 B 13/16 (7 C 22/17)Bverwg / Division 729 giu 2017Granted
Estratto da Omnilex
The Federal Administrative Court upheld the plaintiff’s complaint and admitted revision under Section 132(2)(1) VwGO. It considered the case of fundamental importance because revision could clarify whether jurisdictional provisions may be raised as reviewable objections in an environmental association action against a planning approval decision. The court also fixed the value in dispute for the complaint and revision proceedings.
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; revision admissibility on grounds of fundamental importance in an environmental association action against a planning approval decision: fundamental importance exists where the proposed revision is apt to clarify a previously unresolved legal question capable of general significance. Whether jurisdictional provisions are rügefähig in such proceedings is a question suitable for clarification in revision. The required abstract legal need for clarification is sufficient; the court need not already decide the substantive question in the admissibility stage (consid. 1).
Entscheidungsdatum: 2017-06-29
Aktenzeichen: 7 B 13/16, 7 B 13/16 (7 C 22/17)
ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:290617B7B13.16.0
Dokumenttyp: Beschluss
Normen: § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO
Vorinstanz: vorgehend Hamburgisches Oberverwaltungsgericht, 16. Juni 2016, Az: 1 Bf 258/12, Urteilvorgehend VG Hamburg, 15. November 2012, Az: 15 K 3417/09, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 7. Senat
Revisionszulassung; naturschutzrechtliche Vereinsklage
1 Die zulässige Beschwerde des Klägers ist begründet. Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Das Revisionsverfahren kann voraussichtlich zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, ob bei einer naturschutzrechtlichen Vereinsklage gegen einen Planfeststellungsbeschluss Zuständigkeitsvorschriften rügefähig sind.
2 Die Festsetzung des Streitwerts beruht für das Beschwerdeverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.
Estratto da Omnilex
Whether revision should be admitted for fundamental importance under Section 132(2)(1) VwGO.
Revision was admitted because the case raises a question of fundamental importance.
The higher court considered that the revision can likely clarify whether, in an environmental association action against a planning approval decision, jurisdictional rules are capable of being raised as objections.
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.